No need for apologies of any kind, I'm just tossing in my 2 cents on how I interpreted the post.Originally posted by IS300GTE:
what i found wrong with that paragraph is the first statement, "variable valve timing isn't beneficial to performance at all...." then the poster edited some stuff out and put that last part of his statement. the quotes start at the very first post, and don't unquote, until the last word of the post, so i am taking it that the same person said all of the same stuff.
they are right when they say you could use one cam to achieve the same peak hp that a variable valve system does, but they are wrong when they say it doesn't affect performance at all. - that's how i interpreted it, and responded based on that, if i misinterpreted it, my appologies.