the diff of $7 vlf is probably due to diff options on the car. the license fee is basically a property tax (based on value)Originally posted by Leader:
Interesting that my California renewal was $3 cheaper than "zamscan's" - I just paid $242 net. (The diff was VLF of $610 and VLF Offset of $412.) Wonder why the difference??
[ August 17, 2001: Message edited by: Leader ]
fraid not leader, i don't think you got a better deal than me. i paid $3 more because the vlf includes the box of cookies the dealership sent meOriginally posted by Leader:
I think the license fee is based on the car's "sales price" not its level of options. I obviously got a better deal on my '01 than "zamscan" did (by about $20).