Lexus IS Forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Übercargeek
Joined
·
16,623 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
29184If any recent Lexus model especially exemplifies the historical Toyota spirit of Kaizen, or continuous improvement, and the Passionate and Relentless Pursuit of Perfection, it's the IS F sports sedan. Debuting in the 2008 model year to fairly lavish praise, the IS F was nonetheless lambasted for an overly stiff ride and the lack of a proper limited-slip differential, relying instead on a recalibration of Lexus' VDIM (Vehicle Dynamics Integrated Management) suite of electronic nannies to create a "virtual LSD" effect. And, indeed, the effect was somewhat hallucinogenic or illusory, for chief among the 2010 IS F's improvements was the addition of a mechanical Torsen limited-slip differential. As to the harsh ride, the 2011 model year saw numerous improvements, tweaks and revisions to the electric power steering system, front and rear spring rates, shock absorber dampening, rear bushings and rear camber angle, which were detailed in <A HREF="http://my.is/forums/f41/more-2011-lexus-c-f-questions-answered-418884/">an earlier my.IS Front Page story</A>.

On paper, of course, these improvements should result in a better-handling, more track-worthy IS F. But is this really the case? Car and Driver magazine, in a very interesting comparison, proved conclusively that this is so. For five years running, the magazine has been conducting the Lightning Lap comparison tests at the Grand West Course at Virginia International Raceway (VIR), near Danville, which, in C&D's words, is "a serpentine 4.1-mile circuit that is the nearest the U.S. has to the ultimate racetrack, the Nürburgring Nordschleife in Germany". The Lexus IS F's first Lightning Lap was in 2008, when it joined a whopping 15 cars in Car and Driver's LL2 class, defined as vehicles with a Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price ranging between $30,000 and $59,999. The 2008 IS F reported a mid-pack 7th-place finish, with a 3:14.0 time around the track (that's 3 minutes and 14 seconds to the uninitiated) at an average speed of 77.9 mph. Embarrassingly, this put it behind its archrivals BMW M3 Coupe (3:05.6 time / 81 mph) and Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG (3:06.5 time / 81.1 mph). While praising the 2008 IS F's habit-forming aural accompaniment, grip and powerful, consistent braking, C&D noted that "at high speeds, particularly in VIR’s climbing esses, the IS F’s behavior morphs from eager to darty, eroding driver confidence...steering inputs were a bit dramatic and... A little attention to springs and damping might make this eager contender a real champ".

Lexus listened, and, three years later, returned to Virginia International Raceway to face a far smaller LL2 class of five rivals. This go-around, the 2011 Lexus IS F beat the Mazda RX-8 R3, Subaru Impreza WRX STI, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution SE and Ford Mustang GT 5.0 with a time of 3:05.4 seconds at 79.6 mph. In the 2011 LL2 class, only the Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 was faster than the IS F. For the number-crunchers among you, that makes the 2011 IS F a whopping 8.6 seconds faster per lap than the 2008 version, maintaining a 1.7 mph faster average speed in the process. The numbers only begin to tell the story, though. As excerpts from Car and Driver's write-up inform us:

Lexus has...tweaked all suspension elements. Spring rates are down in the front and up in the rear, and there are larger anti-roll bars, stiffer subframe bushings, and longer bump stops, which effectively increase spring rates when the car is nearing its maximum roll angle. Lexus also lightened the front hubs and control arms and slapped a Torsen limited-slip differential in the rear axle. The result is BMW M3–matching performance around VIR (3:05.4). That’s heady company for Lexus to be keeping. Especially considering that the IS F weighs 3801 pounds (195 more than the M3) and makes only two additional horsepower, at 416...The IS F’s audible shift warning is plenty loud, even when you are wearing a helmet. While the alert is slightly obnoxious on public roads, it lets you keep your eyes up when driving on a track.

The old F rolled around on the track like a keel-less boat in gusting winds. The aforementioned updates quell this tendency and increase confidence. Our backside impressions are supported by numbers: The F exits sector two 13.1 mph quicker than before, at 109.1. Steering is communicative, and the chassis is set up for safe, moderate understeer, but vector adjustment is just a throttle tweak away—the torquey engine (371 pound-feet) can break the rear tires loose easily. The brakes are fantastic, too. The pedal might be a tad wooden (more pliant pine than hard oak), but the system remains fade-free after multiple laps of abuse, something none of the other large sedans could claim this year. The 180-degree character change performed by this Lexus gives us hope that Toyota can still make fun-to-drive cars. Now  where’s our Supra?
For more on this gratifying story (except, perhaps, to older IS F owners), follow the links to Car and Driver's <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/10q4/lightning_lap_2011-feature">2011 Lightning Lap intro page</A>, <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/10q4/lightning_lap_2011-feature/lightning_lap_2011_3a_ll2_class_page_3">2011 LL2 page</A>, <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/10q4/lightning_lap_2011-feature/track_map_3a_vir_track_map_and_lightning_lap_2011_sector_times_page_7">2011 times and interactive track map</A>, <A HREF="http://carvideos.caranddriver.com/?bcpid=627028702&bclid=1111461688&bctid=730520629001">2011 LL2 video</A>, <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/08q4/the_lightning_lap_2008-feature2">2008 Lightning Lap intro page</A>, <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/08q4/the_lightning_lap_2008-feature2/ll2_3a_2430_2c000-_2460_2c000_page_5">2008 LL2 page</A>, <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/original/application/29f64c2ec07fa8aef3548a5d3c4cd280.pdf">2008 times and track map</A> and <A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/10q4/lightning_lap_2011-feature/sortable_times_3a_complete_lightning_lap_times_2006_to_2011_page_8">overall times for all five runnings of the Lightning Lap</A>, including the vehicles breaking the much-vaunted 3-minute mark. And, for some discussion, my.IS moderator gbb357 has started threads in <A HREF="http://my.is/forums/f104/car-driver-lightning-lap-2011-a-423810/">The Garage</A> and <A HREF="http://my.is/forums/f136/2011-f-did-3-05-4-car-drivers-2011-lightning-lap-423811/">IS-F</A> forums.
 

Attachments

·
truth versions only
Joined
·
4,704 Posts
Kudos to Lexus for fixing the "put a set of overly stiff springs and shocks on a luxury car and call it sport" (Tein et. al. anyone??)
What is still baffling me is the fact that the solid axle 2011 Mustang beat what is supposed to be the best-handling production car in Lexus' lineup (sans LFA), the 2011 IS-F. Oh well, it's reversed (albeit with just a couple or so of seconds) in 2011.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,100 Posts
Kudos to Lexus for fixing the "put a set of overly stiff springs and shocks on a luxury car and call it sport" (Tein et. al. anyone??)
What is still baffling me is the fact that the solid axle 2011 Mustang beat what is supposed to be the best-handling production car in Lexus' lineup (sans LFA), the 2011 IS-F. Oh well, it's reversed (albeit with just a couple or so of seconds) in 2011.
Well, the Mustang GT500 also has 144 more HP than the IS-F. Maybe it isn't that it handles better in the corners, but fared better in the straights.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Well, the Mustang GT500 also has 144 more HP than the IS-F. Maybe it isn't that it handles better in the corners, but fared better in the straights.
They said in the article that the course favored horsepower. What will be interesting is when the 2012 Boss 302 mustang appears. The displacement is essentially the same as the IS-F, but in testing the car was beating the lap times of M3s at Laguna Seca by several seconds.
 

·
truth versions only
Joined
·
4,704 Posts
Well, the Mustang GT500 also has 144 more HP than the IS-F. Maybe it isn't that it handles better in the corners, but fared better in the straights.
7No said:
They said in the article that the course favored horsepower. What will be interesting is when the 2012 Boss 302 mustang appears. The displacement is essentially the same as the IS-F, but in testing the car was beating the lap times of M3s at Laguna Seca by several seconds.
Was just referring to the 2011 Ford Mustang GT with the Brembo package, i.e. it has 412HP
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,187 Posts
Was just referring to the 2011 Ford mustang GT with the Brembo package, ie it has 412HP
'Stang is still lighter, which surely plays a role.

Having driving this course, (only on a parade lap) in my F. I'm excited to take my car back for a real drive. Nice to know that suspension tweaks and a mechanical LSD, can shave 10 seconds off one of the best times.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
Yes the GT500 has gobs more power...while the standard GT weighs almost 500lbs less than the IS-F.

Great to see the Engineers took a proactive response, as reducing spring rates and upping the Anti-Roll bar package undoubtedly gives it a better ride, while reducing roll all together.

Additionally, the extra torque of the IS-F versus the M3 surely gives it better "real-world" characteristics. I seriously doubt most guys in the E9x M3's rev them to 8400rpm on a daily basis :)
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top