Lexus IS Forum banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,476 Posts
Well..... When the GS400 came out in 1998, one of the high points that Lexus mentioned of their 300 horsepower 4.0 liter V8 was that it was more economical than the old inline 6 that it replaced (which was in the old GS300 and is pretty much the same as the current engine but without the VVT-i.).. So to answer your question, the engine in the LS400 (4.0liter 290hp V-8) is more advanced (with Aluminum Block) than the engine in the IS300..... BUT really I think the main reason for the poor fuel economy in the IS300 is its final drive ratio.....
Eric......
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,221 Posts
Theories on the low fuel economy:

1> Final drive ratio?
2> Inefficient engine?
3> Extra rich at first to get primary catalyics up to operating temp fast (to get LEV status)?
4> High rolling resistance performance tires?
5> Aggressive e-Throttle setting?

Someone asked a Lexus tech who replied "it is a performance car..." Well, OK, whatever.

Your guess is as good as mine.

===================================

The Nissan Maxima (I think with 222hp) performs a tad better than the IS300 yet gets much better gas mileage. It has a few things which help:
1> Front wheel drive (more efficient drivetrain)
2> "Micropolished/Microfinished" engine parts which are more efficient.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,523 Posts
For the record, in the new Road and Track, they state that the Passat 4Motion's EPA mileage is 17/24. That's from a 2.8L V6 (190 hp), and the 4Motion is heavier.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
57 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
Well, 4WD always waste more gas. A good comparison can be found for the 2WD Carrera and the Carrera4..
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top