Lexus IS Forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
487 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
so far this is the only promising test that showed how they liked the IS-F vs the competition. Surprisingly, the M3 was slower than the IS-F and although they did not call a winner, they preferred the IS-F. also in the issue is an article about the IS300(IS250 in the UK). april 2008 issue now!


TopGear
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,530 Posts
Top Gear FTW!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
575 Posts
so basically this was posted to get everyones hopes up and then realise there`s no article to read?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12 Posts
I bought a magazine today and have a scan of this article now. It's very nice. And it differentiates itself nicely from MT/CD/etc reviews which seems to be focused entirely on lap times and lateral acceleration. BTW, 0-62 they got as following: is-f (4.8), C63(4.6), M3(4.9), RS4(4.8)

It's 4 jpeg files. I guess I need to host them somewhere to post here and I don't have time to do this. If somebody can post them, PM me and I will email you these files...
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top