I own a 2000 Z3 2.3 (2.5 liter engine) and a 2001 IS. I was comparing stats on the 2 cars. I noticed that the Z3 is .1 second faster from 0-60. Both have in-line 6's. Bimmer is a 2.5 while the IS is 3.0. Bimmer has 170 hp while the IS sports 215. I realize the IS is a heavier car (almost 400lbs). Could the difference in weight cause that much of a difference in performance? I am sure gear ratios and a slew of other factors come into play here. Just wondering how a car with significantly less hp could turn out faster times than my beloved IS. I figured I would toss this out to all of the car aficionados out there. What better place to ask than IS300.net. I drive both cars on a regular basis.
While they both do have very different feels, it is difficult to distinguish between variances in power. Maybe some of the Bimmer fans that frequent this board could shed some light on the subject.
Apologies in advance for my mindless banter.
Comparingly Yours,
Lex
Disclaimer: I am by no stretch of the imagination a car expert, nor do I claim to be one (Hence this post).
------------------
2001 SBM/Black IS300 w/Navigation
2000 BMW Z3 2.3
1999 Ducati SS 750(worked)
1982 Captain America Big Wheel
Actually, the drag coefficient of the IS300 is 0.29, 2nd lowest in its vehicle class only bested by the new C-series, while that of the Z3 is a much higher 0.40 (typically, BMWs have fairly bad drag coefficients).
But to answer your question, three reasons:
1. Automatic transmission. The manual version of the IS300 is expected to do 0-60 in 6.5sec.
2. Weight. As you said, the IS300 is about 400 pounds heavier.
3. Gearing. The IS300 gearing is a carryover from GS-series with only a change in final drive and wheel diameter. Consequently, it has to hit 60 in 3rd gear.
What is the drag coefficient of that thing? I remember reading that either it or the LS430 was .25, which is the lowest CD of any sedan. Which was it? I cant recall right now.
Originally posted by DtEW: Actually, the drag coefficient of the IS300 is 0.29, 2nd lowest in its vehicle class only bested by the new C-series, while that of the Z3 is a much higher 0.40 (typically, BMWs have fairly bad drag coefficients).
The LS430 w/Ultra Luxury Package, because it requires the air suspension to lower the car. Non air-suspended LS430s are 0.26.
Originally posted by IIIseries: What is the drag coefficient of that thing? I remember reading that either it or the LS430 was .25, which is the lowest CD of any sedan. Which was it? I cant recall right now.
Yup, just like vr6 and Dtew said. Weight, gearing, and the AUTO is what slows down your IS vs the Z3. Coefficient of drag will play a role, but a small one, at least to 60 mph. It has a greater effect on HIGH SPEEDS (for ex, top speed) than a 0-60 sprint.
I picked up a 2000 Z3 2.3 last Saturday. After driving it for a week, i was not overly impressed with the power. Don't get me wrong; it wasn't slow, but i expected more. I went yesterday to a different dealer. They gave me exactly what I paid for my trade. In addition, they took about 2 thousand off of the price of the new one. So; to answer your question, I only had to pay the difference between the 2 cars (about 11K).
Upgradingly Yours,
Lex
PS: On a side note, there is a huge difference between the 2 cars. I picked up 55hp plus a bunch of other upgrades. the only thing this car did not have that the 2.3 had is an on-board computer (dang). Anyone know if one can be added after?
------------------
2001 SBM/Black IS300 w/Navigation
2001 BMW Z3 3.01 Titanium Silver w/Black
1999 Ducati SS 750(worked)
1982 Captain America Big Wheel
My 2 cents. If you can afford the 3.2, I would go for that. i would also recommend looking into the Z3 if you haven't already. If you drive stick, the M Roadster is supposed to be putting out around 300hp(WOW). that car must do wheelies.
Opinionatedly Yours,
Lex
------------------
2001 SBM/Black IS300 w/Navigation
2001 BMW Z3 3.01 Titanium Silver w/Black
1999 Ducati SS 750(worked)
1982 Captain America Big Wheel
Originally posted by LexArkana: My 2 cents. If you can afford the 3.2, I would go for that. i would also recommend looking into the Z3 if you haven't already. If you drive stick, the M Roadster is supposed to be putting out around 300hp(WOW). that car must do wheelies.
I've looekd at Z3's before and was not impressed. Don't get me wrong, the car is a little more fun to drive, but I want my foreign car MADE in a foreign country. That's what's turnmed me against some acuras, hondas, and toyotas, because their quality was not up to par with the foriegn made cars.
And to top it off, I have fallen in love with the looks, exclusitivity, and top of the SLK. I lvoe the styling of my car, I just long for a stick shift and a little extra power. Hell, I would consider trading myne in for a 2000 LTD edition 5 speed, but I just want a little more grunt. Also, SLK's aren't nearly as common as Z3's aronud here, which I see alot. But the top is just the icing on the cake. I love it. I can drive my car with confidence in bad weather (except for deep snow of course).
But don't get me wrong, I love the Z3 and even more-so with the M, but I ADORE my SLK.
------------------ 1998 Mercedes Benz SLK230 2000 Ford Excursion Ltd. 4x4 Diesel (for the winter)
Originally posted by Altezzer: I've looekd at Z3's before and was not impressed. Don't get me wrong, the car is a little more fun to drive, but I want my foreign car MADE in a foreign country. That's what's turnmed me against some acuras, hondas, and toyotas, because their quality was not up to par with the foriegn made cars.
And to top it off, I have fallen in love with the looks, exclusitivity, and top of the SLK. I lvoe the styling of my car, I just long for a stick shift and a little extra power. Hell, I would consider trading myne in for a 2000 LTD edition 5 speed, but I just want a little more grunt. Also, SLK's aren't nearly as common as Z3's aronud here, which I see alot. But the top is just the icing on the cake. I love it. I can drive my car with confidence in bad weather (except for deep snow of course).
But don't get me wrong, I love the Z3 and even more-so with the M, but I ADORE my SLK.
Cool. The SLK is definitely a SWEEET car. I was looking at them also. AMG package looks real good. My neighbor picked one up a couple of months ago. He raves about it.
Now, if I could only figure out a way to get him to let me drive it...hmm...
Plottingly Yours,
Lex
------------------
2001 SBM/Black IS300 w/Navigation
2001 BMW Z3 3.0i Titanium Silver w/Black
1999 Ducati SS 750(worked)
1982 Captain America Big Wheel
Okay so I just had a mechanic install an HKS Dragger II exhaust that was brand new (I initially was going to do it myself but was persuaded otherwise) on my 2001 IS300 and am hearing what sounds like a tin can rattling behind my car between the speeds of 5 and 15 mph only while I am coasting...
I know this has been asked heaps. But they always delete the answer or close the thread. I locked my Fob and Key In the boot. A lot of forums say there's a trick to get the boot open wit out the key. Can some one tell me how or PM me how thanks heaps x
I've always wanted to have an IS300, but I wanted one in good condition with a factory manual. After a bit of searching, I found one for sale in Atlanta with 195k miles. High mileage, but very well maintained. Has every option available in 02 - full leather, nav, LSD, manual. Mods were minimal...
Hello! New to the forums and very new to owning an is300.
So information about the car: I recently was given a 2003 is300 and I love the car but there have been somethings that Ive needed to either replace or fix due to the previous owners poor maintenance. which have been a little frustrating...
Community dedicated to Lexus IS Enthusiasts. Come in and enjoy our articles, galleries and information on aftermarket parts for the IS300, IS250, IS350.
