Article can be found at the following URL:
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=1316555&a=11151042
When I told my (BMW) dealer that I was looking at the IS300, he immediately gave me an article. It was a specially made article from Motor Trend hi-liting a comparison between a 200 328i Sport, 2001 IS300, and 2000 Cadillac Catera Sport. The article gave the nod to the 328i, but did have favourable things to say about the IS300. In fact, the article implied that if the IS300 that they test was a 5-speed, it would get the nod. At least that was my read on it.
I think that BMW is looking over their shoulder, and they should. I suspect that there are many BMW owners (including myself) that are taking a close favourable look at the IS.
I also think that this sort of thing is conformation that the IS300 (if not already) is a genuine competitor to the 3-series. I think this is great for all of us. A good healthy competition should produce better pricing and a better product.
I personally think that BMW made a mistake with their pricing strategy (i.e., they get you when you include a few options). Not to beat a dead horse to death, but a 330i (fully outfitted) is in the same price range as the Audi S4. A 3-series head to head comparison to the S4, in my opinion gives the edge to the S4. Now there is the Lexus IS300. Better priced, comparable performance (with 5-speed hopefully) and buyers now have a real dilemma. I think things are going to boil down to looks (which is subjective - they are all good looking cars in their own regard), and pricing.
----
Originally posted by triz:
ok. so where is this damn article!