Joined
·
1,870 Posts
That does make total sense. Not to toot my own horn (seriously), but I'm an engineer and I'm familiar with these concepts.
However, if I'm remembering my buddy's issue correctly - I'm pretty sure the ARP directions are to NOT lube between the hardened washer and the cylinder head - ONLY lube between the bolt's integrated washer/flange and the washer itself; which would introduce what you are calling an "unknown source of friction" between the washer and cylinder head.
I'm fully on board with your explanation and totally agree, but if I understood my (mech engineer) buddy's issue correctly - ARP would be relying on a less-repeatable and higher-friction interface to set clamp load...which doesn't make sense to me.
PS: I've got a rod bolt stretch gage in my toolbox - it's the only way to torque critical fasteners when you've got access to both ends!
However, if I'm remembering my buddy's issue correctly - I'm pretty sure the ARP directions are to NOT lube between the hardened washer and the cylinder head - ONLY lube between the bolt's integrated washer/flange and the washer itself; which would introduce what you are calling an "unknown source of friction" between the washer and cylinder head.
I'm fully on board with your explanation and totally agree, but if I understood my (mech engineer) buddy's issue correctly - ARP would be relying on a less-repeatable and higher-friction interface to set clamp load...which doesn't make sense to me.
PS: I've got a rod bolt stretch gage in my toolbox - it's the only way to torque critical fasteners when you've got access to both ends!